<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brattleboro Buyer-Brokerage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buyer-brokerage.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buyer-brokerage.com</link>
	<description>First exclusive buyer&#039;s broker in Vermont, since 1996</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:23:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Local Home Prices Drop</title>
		<link>http://www.buyer-brokerage.com/uncategorized/2012/01/local-home-prices-drop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buyer-brokerage.com/uncategorized/2012/01/local-home-prices-drop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 22:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brattleboro Buyer-Brokerage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buyer-brokerage.com/?p=256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When people ask about real estate market conditions, generally the subtext is that they are really asking what things will be like six months or a year from now. Of course statistics can only tell us what has already occurred. Despite this inherent shortcoming: A sound statistical analysis can still give us a valuable perspective<a href="http://www.buyer-brokerage.com/uncategorized/2012/01/local-home-prices-drop/">....</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When people ask about real estate market conditions, generally the subtext is that they are really asking what things will be like six months or a year from now. Of course statistics can only tell us what has already occurred.</p>
<p>Despite this inherent shortcoming: A sound statistical analysis can still give us a valuable perspective on trends. The most straightforward analysis would be to compare current year-end figures with last year’s; and to compare local trends with national trends.</p>
<p>Statistics never fit into perfect theoretical models: In fact statisticians know that if a report of the results of 100 coin flips do not have a string of 6 or 7 head or tails in a row, then the results were probably faked. But this year, our real estate statistics have certain unexplained, anomalies too great to shrug off.</p>
<p>Median home price in the past year went <em>down</em> 3.4% nationally, <em>down</em> 8.78% in Windham County, and <em>up </em>4.21% statewide. Generally, Windham County and the state as a whole have followed national trends, only with considerably less magnitude. When national home prices were down 30%, for example, Windham County prices tended to be down 5% &#8211; 10%.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.buyer-brokerage.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/CHART1.pdf">CHART COMPARING 2011 YEAR-END HOME PRICES WITH PREVIOUS YEAR</a></p>
<p>But last year’s precipitous drop means that Windham County median home prices have now fallen by greater than 15% from their peak. That is still just under half of the national percentage drop, but that is a dramatically different picture than in years past.</p>
<p>Anecdotally, this past year I have been surprised at how much lower asking prices often were, and I have also seen that buyers are particularly firm, so that in many instances if a seller wants a deal, they must compromise a lot or else end up with nothing. OK, so Adam Smith’s unseen hand is at work, but why so strongly in Windham County?</p>
<p>Where is local residential real estate heading in 2012? I am planning to write about that with great accurancy in 2013.</p>
<div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buyer-brokerage.com/uncategorized/2012/01/local-home-prices-drop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2010 Home Sales &#8211; Slump or Surge?</title>
		<link>http://www.buyer-brokerage.com/real_estate/2011/01/225/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buyer-brokerage.com/real_estate/2011/01/225/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 02:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brattleboro Buyer-Brokerage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buyer-brokerage.com/?p=225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On January 25, 2011, the New York Times ran a story titled: &#8220;U. S. Home Prices Slump Again, Hitting New Lows.&#8221; The same day, the headline of the lead story in an online Realtor® newsletter was: “New Home Sales Surge.” Both stories were true. Each emphasized different facts. For our local real estate market, “Mixed Indicators” might<a href="http://www.buyer-brokerage.com/real_estate/2011/01/225/">....</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>On January 25, 2011, the New York Times ran a story titled: &#8220;U. S. Home Prices Slump Again, Hitting New Lows.&#8221; The same day, the headline of the lead story in an online Realtor® newsletter was: “New Home Sales Surge.”</p>
<p>Both stories were true. Each emphasized different facts.</p>
<p>For our local real estate market, “Mixed Indicators” might be an accurate description. Median price reported in MLS for single family homes sold in Windham County in 2010  was up over the previous year by 2.6%. But the number of sales were down: -2.5%</p>
<p>When we examine the actual numbers, the difference in Windham County residential sales figures between 2010 and 2009 may not be significant. The 2.6% rise in median price was up from $195,000 to $200,000. And the -2.5% drop in number of sales was from 522 to 509, which is a difference of only 13 sales. If someone had sneezed or scratched their nose; what was up might have been down, and down might have been up.</p>
<p>When we look at the figures [shown on the accompanying chart] what we really see is that, since the crash of 2008, our local residential real estate market has shown little change: either in median prices, or in number of sales. In the context of the national recession, holding steady may not be so bad.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.buyer-brokerage.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/statistics-2010-year-end-chart-Windham-County1.pdf">Windham County Vermont Home Sales: 2005 &#8211; 2010</a></p>
<p>The Standard &amp; Poor’s <a title="Case-Shiller Home Price Indices" href="http://www.standardandpoors.com/servlet/BlobServer?blobheadername3=MDT-Type&amp;blobcol=urldocumentfile&amp;blobtable=SPComSecureDocument&amp;blobheadervalue2=inline%3B+filename%3Ddownload.pdf&amp;blobheadername2=Content-Disposition&amp;blobheadervalue1=application%2Fpdf&amp;blobkey=id&amp;blobheadername1=content-type&amp;blobwhere=1245286034462&amp;blobheadervalue3=abinary%3B+charset%3DUTF-8&amp;blobnocache=true" target="_self">Case-Shiller Home Price Indices</a> show a dramatic contrast between local and national trends. According to Case-Shiller: “Measured from June/July 2006 through November 2010, the peak-to-current decline for both the10-City Composite and 20-City Composite is -30.3%. The improvements from their April 2009 trough are +4.8% and +3.3%, respectively.”</p>
<p>Compared with the -30.3% national decline: From our 2007 peak median price, the total drop in Windham County has been -7%.</p>
<p>What is in store for local real estate in the upcoming year? I plan to address that question with 100% accuracy: That article is scheduled for publication in January, 2012.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buyer-brokerage.com/real_estate/2011/01/225/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Third Quarter Home Sales</title>
		<link>http://www.buyer-brokerage.com/real_estate/2010/09/third-quarter-home-sales/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buyer-brokerage.com/real_estate/2010/09/third-quarter-home-sales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brattleboro Buyer-Brokerage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buyer-brokerage.com/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BRATTLEBORO HOMES SALES &#8211; THIRD QUARTER REPORT Third quarter figures show that Brattleboro residential real estate sales have &#8220;bounced back,&#8221; from the May decline, so that we are at about the same lackluster level as this time last year. Number of sales are up slightly, average prices down. But due to the low sample size,<a href="http://www.buyer-brokerage.com/real_estate/2010/09/third-quarter-home-sales/">....</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>BRATTLEBORO HOMES SALES &#8211; THIRD QUARTER REPORT</strong></p>
<p>Third quarter figures show that Brattleboro residential real estate sales have &#8220;bounced back,&#8221; from the May decline, so that we are at about the same lackluster level as this time last year.</p>
<p>Number of sales are up slightly, average prices down. But due to the low sample size, and to the fact that the overwhelming number of closing occur in the last quarter of any given year; slight fluctuations from this time last year, are hardly predictive of 2010 year=end figures.</p>
<p>The numbers speak for themselves, my interpretation is not likely any better than yours. So here is the data:</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12.7315px;"><a href="http://www.buyer-brokerage.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Brattleboro-Third-Quarter-2010-32.pdf">Brattleboro Third Quarter 2010-3</a></span></p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buyer-brokerage.com/real_estate/2010/09/third-quarter-home-sales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real estate plunges with tax credit expiration</title>
		<link>http://www.buyer-brokerage.com/real_estate/2010/05/real-estate-plunges-with-tax-credit-expansio/</link>
		<comments>http://www.buyer-brokerage.com/real_estate/2010/05/real-estate-plunges-with-tax-credit-expansio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 16:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brattleboro Buyer-Brokerage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax credit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://72.34.42.231/~buyerbr/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is always difficult to discern what the real estate statistics for the first 6 months predict for any particular year. 

This year, the end of the federal home buyer tax credit was a wild card.  Buyers who put a home under contract before April 30, and closed before the end of June were eligible for up to an $8,000 benefit. 

Although the expiration of the tax credit was expected to prompt a drop in home sales, the actual numbers were dramatic.

Following the expiration deadline, the National Association of Realtors® (NAR) Pending Home Sales Index (PHSI) dropped 33.3 % for homes put under contract in May of this year compared with May of 2009. (Using seasonally adjusted figures, the drop was 30%). ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is always difficult to discern what the real estate statistics for the first 6 months predict for any particular year. </p>
<p>This year, the end of the federal home buyer tax credit was a wild card.  Buyers who put a home under contract before April 30, and closed before the end of June were eligible for up to an $8,000 benefit. </p>
<p>Although the expiration of the tax credit was expected to prompt a drop in home sales, the actual numbers were dramatic.</p>
<p>Following the expiration deadline, the National Association of Realtors® (NAR) Pending Home Sales Index (PHSI) dropped 33.3 % for homes put under contract in May of this year compared with May of 2009. (Using seasonally adjusted figures, the drop was 30%). <br />
<span id="more-18"></span><br />
Chief economist for NAR, Lawrence Yun, believes that home buyers rushing to buy homes before the expiration, meant that the high April figure “borrowed” from what would have been May demand, and that sales figures will re-adjust. Critics say that this is industry happy talk.</p>
<p>Vermont real estate experienced a similar uptick followed by a plunge  Northern New England Real Estate Network (NNEREN) Multiple Listing Service (MLS) statistics record that 496 Vermont homes went under contract in May of 2009, as compared with 349 homes during May of 2010: A drop of almost 30%, similar to the national figure. </p>
<p>For Windham County, 49 homes went under contract in May last year, as compared with 23 in May this year: A 53% decline. For June this year compared with June a year ago, the number fell from 43 to 37, a dip of just 14%. </p>
<p>One optimistic sign is that, even with the downturn in May and June, the total number of homes going under contract in Windham County for the first half of 2010 was up &#8212; if only slightly &#8212; compared with the same period last year. From January 1 to June 30 of this year the number was 249, up from 231 last year: a 7% rise.</p>
<p>Although the tax credit expiration is an anomaly which makes it difficult to interpret real estate demand; other figures are unambiguous: Home sales are up, prices are up. </p>
<p>During the first half of 2009 in Windham County, 194 homes closed at a median price of $185,500; for the same period this year 242 homes sold with a median price of $195,500, which is a  5% increase.</p>
<p>Of note is that, despite higher sale prices this year, asking prices were lower.  Last year the median asking price was $207,000, but this year the median asking price was $200,000. </p>
<p>Look at those numbers&#8230; they should raise eyebrows! It shows that during the first half of 2009, homes in Windham County typically sold at $21,500 below asking price. During the same period this year, asking prices were more reasonable so that, on average, a concession of only $4,500 was sufficient to clinch a deal.</p>
<p>Reading the tea leaves, it appears that sellers are pricing their homes more realistically so that there are fewer deadlocks and more successful transactions.  <br />
Steven K-Brooks</p>
<p>[Real Estate Roundup is updated twice weekly, so you may want to bookmark this page.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.buyer-brokerage.com/real_estate/2010/05/real-estate-plunges-with-tax-credit-expansio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

